lkpthing.blogg.se

Flow route examination magicad
Flow route examination magicad







flow route examination magicad

This query is borne out of trying to avoid calculating the distance from the spill to the stream/river reach using simple straight line geometry in a GIS tool, such as the proximity toolset in ArcMap.ĭoes anyone have any experience with this?ĮDIT: Based on the responses so far, it seems that using a routing algorithm that allows for dispersion, and then calculating the shortest path out of the possible paths predicted by the algorithm, might be the solution I want. In either of these cases, however, once one has a DEM that he/she feels represents the terrain well enough for an analysis, which algorithm should they choose? For instance, a 30m digital elevation model (DEM) cold prove useful in a forested or agricultural area, but a 1m or sub-1m DEM might be necessary for sorting out the true flow path (and therefore the true shortest path) in a highly urbanized area. There are different assumptions or starting datasets that could change the answer.

flow route examination magicad

The end application would be in determining the overland flow path from a spill site to a stream/river reach that provides the earliest possible time for entry of the spill into the stream/river. It minimizes dispersion (which would most likely slow the spill down) and maximizes velocity (ignoring surface friction due to different landcover types - if this can be ignored) by choosing the steepest path. My best educated guess would be that the D8 would provide the quickest path for a spill traveling from land to the stream. What would be the best flow routing algorithm for determining the quickest (and by this I suppose I mean shortest) path that a spill would take when traveling to a stream?









Flow route examination magicad